Civil partnerships and same-sex relationships – a statement by the House of Bishops of the Church of England

Civil partnerships and same-sex relationships – a statement by the House of Bishops of the Church of England

The House of Bishops today issued a statement about the continuing debate within the Church of England about same-sex relationships. Speaking on behalf of the House, the Bishop of Norwich, the Rt Revd Graham James, said:

“Contrary to popular perception the House of Bishops has spent very little time over recent years discussing homosexuality. The last substantive engagement with the issue was in 2005 when the House agreed to issue a pastoral statement prepared by a group under my chairmanship on the implications of the introduction of civil partnerships. The House has now agreed that the time has come to commission two new pieces of work.

“First it has asked for a review of the 2005 statement in the light of subsequent developments. The review will include examination of whether priests in civil partnerships should be eligible for appointment as bishops. The 2005 statement was silent on this issue and, while the relevant legal background was analysed in a recently published Legal Office note, the House acknowledges its responsibility to address the policy issue. To avoid pre-empting the outcome of the review the House has concluded that clergy in civil partnerships should not, at present, be nominated for episcopal appointment. The review will be completed in 2012.

“Secondly, the House has committed itself to a wider look at the Church of England’s approach to same-sex relationships more generally in the light of the listening process launched by the Lambeth Conference in 1998. The Bishops will produce a consultation document in 2013. The House’s decision is motivated by a desire to help shape the continuing debate constructively and not by any view about what the outcome should be.”

The statement follows:

A Statement from the House of Bishops of the Church of England

“It is now nearly six years since the House issued its Pastoral Statement prior to the introduction of civil partnerships in December 2005. The preparation of that document was the last occasion when the House devoted substantial time to the issue of same sex relationships. We undertook to keep that Pastoral Statement under review. We have decided that the time has come for a review to take place.

“Over the past five and half years there have been several developments. Consistent with the guidelines in the Pastoral Statement a number of clergy are now in civil partnerships. The General Synod decided to amend the clergy pension scheme to improve the provision for the surviving civil partners of clergy who have died. More recently Parliament has decided that civil partnerships may be registered on religious premises where the relevant religious authority has consented (the necessary regulations are expected this autumn).

“The review will need to take account of this changing scene. The Pastoral Statement was not concerned with clergy alone but with the whole people of God. We recognise that bishops and clergy have found ways of engaging pastorally with those in civil partnerships, both at the time of registration and subsequently. Within the Anglican tradition our theological thinking is formed by a reasoned interpretation of Scripture, within the living tradition of the Church informed by pastoral experience. The House believes there is a theological task to be done to clarify further our understanding of the nature and status of these partnerships.

“These are the background issues for a review of the 2005 Statement. It will be undertaken in the context of the Church of England’s teaching on same sex relations as set out in the General Synod motion of November 1987 and Issues in Human Sexuality (a teaching statement from the House of Bishops in 1991). It will also be consistent with the approach taken by the Anglican Communion in Resolution 1.10 of the Lambeth Conference 1998 and subsequently.

“Among the matters to be considered in the review of the 2005 Statement there is one of some importance which the House did not address in advance of any experience of civil partnerships. This is whether clergy who have registered civil partnerships should be eligible for nomination to the episcopate. The House has concluded that it would be wrong to pre-empt the outcome of the review and that clergy in civil partnerships should not at present, therefore, be nominated for episcopal appointment. The House’s intention is to complete the review, which will need to take account of the legal analysis set out in GS MISC 992 (Choosing Bishops – the Equality Act) during 2012.

“The House has also decided that more work is now needed on the Church of England’s approach to human sexuality more generally. In February 2007, the General Synod passed a motion commending ‘continuing efforts to prevent the diversity of opinion about human sexuality creating further division and impaired fellowship within the Church of England and the Anglican Communion.’

“Alongside the review of the 2005 Pastoral Statement, the House intends, therefore, to draw together material from the listening process which has been undertaken within the Church of England over the recent years in the light of the 1998 Lambeth Conference resolution. The House wishes to offer proposals on how the continuing discussion within the Church of England about these matters might best be shaped in the light of the listening process. Our intention is to produce a further consultation document in 2013.”

The statement has been issued to General Synod members today, as GS Misc 997E. It is available on the Church of England website.

Comments

  1. Chris.B says

    Dear Colin, Well done you being ‘off the mark’ so quick..
    I read: ‘This is whether clergy who have registered civil partnerships should be eligible for nomination to the episcopate.’ Does not this by implication suggest that they recognise clergy in relationships? This in itself may be a move forward!
    I do find the whole issue pharisaical and out of kilter with the rest of society when any sentient educated person has and cannot see what the issue is? So far removed are they from the norms of the world in which they otherwise live.
    Further, having people in a position casting judgment on their ‘own kind’ who are otherwise more in touch with their own integrity, understanding and being; created in the image of God himself! And these bishops amongst their number; gays who are celibate solely through advancement of years! Or married and it calls to question to what degree of honesty and commitment; they may have honoured their matrimonial vows…?
    It really is about time this whole issue was laid to rest and the CofE at least can be seen to be in touch with the world and therefore have some relevance to it! I really do think it is about time, if necessary some sacrifice was made on the altar of modernity and transparency! When every other organisation demands transparency and a declaration of interests.. these would be shameful characters ought to declare their homo interests before they are put on the altar & slain by the media for their hypocrisy!

    Even a former Archbishop of York cannot hide behind a gray veil (as much as he would have liked to..) others at the time could and still could shine such a light for him to see more clearly! We all have a past (and memories!!) & that past and events can be brought together and pieced together so easily in the present society in which we live. Sad it is and woeful that people are in positions these days, of which they had not the least bit of realization; as to how fast the evolution of technological communication could expose them for who and what they are.

    I think there are those of us.. who whilst professing a christian faith and wishing to act accordingly – still can come to a realisation of a way forward through a ‘greater happiness principle’. Many lives have been wrecked on this issue and for the sake of a few more?

  2. Mavis Ogden says

    My dear Colin, we always knew what curates we had were of ‘that persuasion’ some young ladies were given nonetheless to chase them! But frankly who cared? Who cares if a bishop is gay? A three second wonder! I would never dream of what they got up to in their private moments! nor them mine! (I hope!) Everybody knows the church is full of puffs and so why pretend otherwise? They are all lovely boys all of them – I love them all equally.

Join the discussion